Realme GT Neo 3 音频测试

我们对 Realme GT Neo 3 进行了严格的 SBMARK Audio 测试套件，以测量其使用内置麦克风录制声音和通过扬声器播放音频时的性能。
在这篇评论中，我们将分解它在各种测试和几个常见用例中的表现。

概述

主要音频规格包括：

• Two speakers: one at the bottom right that turns on; 1 upper central front fire
• 无音频输出插孔
• 杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）技术

复制

注册

The Realme GT Neo 3 achieved a SBMARK Audio score of 118, with overall disappointing performance in both playback and recording. Recording performance, in particular, was marred by a multitude of artifacts caused by excessive processing.

虽然播放声音几乎没有伪影，中频呈现得体，但明显缺乏高低频延伸，导致鼻音和整体播放性能不佳。

When using the device to record audio, the volume was good and good amplitude was rendered, even holding the phone in portrait orientation while recording. Strong processing achieved an excellent signal-to-noise ratio, but it also produced a number of artifacts, including compression, gating, phasing, and volume jumps. Overall, the device would benefit from fine-tuning the processing algorithms. The stamp was also poor and lacking in consistency. Tonal balance sounded muffled or nasal or both. Overall, it’s hard to recommend the Realme GT Neo 3 to any audio-focused smartphone user.

测试总结

了解 SBMARK 音频测试：为了在我们的智能手机音频评论中进行评分和分析，SBMARK 工程师进行了一系列客观测试，并在受控实验室条件下进行了 20 多个小时的感知评估。
（有关我们的复制协议的更多详细信息，请单击此处；有关我们的注册协议的更多详细信息，请单击此处。）
以下部分收集了我们在 SBMARK 实验室进行的详尽测试和分析的关键要素。 可根据要求以报告的形式提供详细的绩效评估。 不要犹豫与我们联系。

The GT Neo 3 did slightly better for playback than for recording, but still leaves some room for improvement. Tonal rendering through the internal speakers was rather unbalanced, with a narrow spectrum and a clear emphasis on the midrange. The highs were dull and there was a serious lack of high-end extension as well as low-end extension and bass.

In terms of dynamics, the device performed at an average level. Attack yield was correct, but lack of bass affected envelope yield and punch was weak. The Realme speakers offered medium amplitude, and although the localizability was correct, it was quite difficult to pinpoint the position of individual sound sources in the scene. The voices sounded slightly distant, even veiled on some occasions. The minimum volume level was slightly low, which made it difficult to properly hear weak content, such as classical music. At the other end of the volume spectrum, the device was powerful enough but not at the same level as the best-in-class.

Overall, few sonic artifacts are noticed, just some distortion and compression at high volume levels. While it was possible to accidentally cover the speakers with your hands while holding the phone normally, the occlusion of the speakers didn’t compromise the listening experience too much.

听听在与一些竞争对手的比较中测试的智能手机的播放性能：

与竞争对手相比，Realme GT Neo 3 在播放用例中的表现如下：

以下是在以最大音量播放我们的嘻哈和古典音乐样本录音时测量的一些声压级 (SPL)：

下图显示了音量从最小到最大的逐渐变化。 我们希望这些更改在整个范围内保持一致，以便所有音量级别都符合用户期望：

If you are planning to use Realme GT Neo 3 as a recording device, you may want to consider alternatives. The timbre was poor and too focused on the midrange, with recordings that sounded muffled and nasal. The highs were weak and diminished, and the lack of bass and low-end extension was particularly noticeable in recordings at high SPLs, such as concerts.

The Realme provided excellent signal-to-noise ratio in all test use cases, but strong compression and high noise reduction processing produced a very unreliable envelope rendering, with opaque and explosive attacks as well as a unrealistic sustain. Stereo width was pretty good in the recordings, but the locations of the sound sources in the scene were unstable and difficult to spot. On the plus side, the recording volume was pretty good overall.

Some artifacts were evident in GT Neo 3’s recordings. Both compression and distortion were overall quite moderate, but became more intrusive at high volume levels. Our testers also found that it is easy to accidentally occlude the microphones with your fingers. Finger noises were also quite noticeable in the recorded sound. The background performance was poor overall, with a muffled sound and a resonant sonority.

与竞争对手相比，Realme GT Neo 3 在用例注册方面的表现如下：

以下是音频和视频文件中记录的声级，以 LUFS（响度单位满量程）测量； 作为参考，我们预计录制内容的响度级别高于 -24 LUFS：

在此音频比较中，您可以听到这款智能手机与竞争对手相比如何处理风噪声：